<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple: least creative company name ever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/</link>
	<description>A blog about nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:14:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nomex</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-109875</link>
		<dc:creator>nomex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-109875</guid>
		<description>I think apple - it&#039;s just a name, because they do good in designs but their hardware works not in a good way, many bugs etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think apple &#8211; it&#8217;s just a name, because they do good in designs but their hardware works not in a good way, many bugs etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-101420</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-101420</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always figured that Google was a reference to the word &quot;googol&quot; which is 10 to the 100th power.  It makes sense if you think about it.  They&#039;re saying that they give you lots of results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always figured that Google was a reference to the word &#8220;googol&#8221; which is 10 to the 100th power.  It makes sense if you think about it.  They&#8217;re saying that they give you lots of results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-92324</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-92324</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with comments above, large amounts of fail in this post.  Google does have subtle meaning and a play on mathematics: google Googol.

Amazon?  What relevance does a female warrior culture or river have to do with books?  Not a terrible name but kind of goofy.

IBM[=International Business Machines], Apple, UPS[=United Parcel Service), FedEx[=Federal Express, all excellent names in my book, and even better branding and recognition.  Also, lot of common (and good) company names derive from surnames or locations.  Not particularly creative, but unless a name is really bad it usually doesn&#039;t matter much.

The only valid point you make is that Apple product names are terrible.  They sound like cheap Asian knock-off products.  Luckily they have good branding, marketing, design, and [sometimes] engineering to back it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with comments above, large amounts of fail in this post.  Google does have subtle meaning and a play on mathematics: google Googol.</p>
<p>Amazon?  What relevance does a female warrior culture or river have to do with books?  Not a terrible name but kind of goofy.</p>
<p>IBM[=International Business Machines], Apple, UPS[=United Parcel Service), FedEx[=Federal Express, all excellent names in my book, and even better branding and recognition.  Also, lot of common (and good) company names derive from surnames or locations.  Not particularly creative, but unless a name is really bad it usually doesn't matter much.</p>
<p>The only valid point you make is that Apple product names are terrible.  They sound like cheap Asian knock-off products.  Luckily they have good branding, marketing, design, and [sometimes] engineering to back it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-91892</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-91892</guid>
		<description>Wow, I hope nobody every pays you for your opinion on these things. If Apple changed their name at this point it would cost millions of dollars, and lose them many more millions in lost brand recognition. You completely fail to understand what image IS... Image is the fact that if somebody talks about Dells or HPs or Compaqs people think &quot;generic PC&quot;. When somebody says Apple we know what it is, we know the brand, a handful of products, we know the look. We are even at the point where people look at other items and describe them as &quot;looking like an Apple product&quot;... 

Me, I use PC&#039;s. I absolutely hate macs and dislike Apple for the entire cult status they have... but to deny that they have one of the best brands out there is laughable. 

No, all in all, this post is FAIL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I hope nobody every pays you for your opinion on these things. If Apple changed their name at this point it would cost millions of dollars, and lose them many more millions in lost brand recognition. You completely fail to understand what image IS&#8230; Image is the fact that if somebody talks about Dells or HPs or Compaqs people think &#8220;generic PC&#8221;. When somebody says Apple we know what it is, we know the brand, a handful of products, we know the look. We are even at the point where people look at other items and describe them as &#8220;looking like an Apple product&#8221;&#8230; </p>
<p>Me, I use PC&#8217;s. I absolutely hate macs and dislike Apple for the entire cult status they have&#8230; but to deny that they have one of the best brands out there is laughable. </p>
<p>No, all in all, this post is FAIL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-66845</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-66845</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with the Apple ? It sounds so cool !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with the Apple ? It sounds so cool !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suha</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-66487</link>
		<dc:creator>Suha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-66487</guid>
		<description>Suggest me a name for a firm which has services like HR Services and Archtecting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggest me a name for a firm which has services like HR Services and Archtecting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudkipz</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-44358</link>
		<dc:creator>mudkipz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-44358</guid>
		<description>You think the word &quot;google&quot; has no meaning?

You may want to do a little research before you write some inane shit on the web. 

Also, this from a &quot;writer&quot; on matusiak.eu.  Matusiak.eu? Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think the word &#8220;google&#8221; has no meaning?</p>
<p>You may want to do a little research before you write some inane shit on the web. </p>
<p>Also, this from a &#8220;writer&#8221; on matusiak.eu.  Matusiak.eu? Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-44294</link>
		<dc:creator>derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-44294</guid>
		<description>sorry to say in the first place... big linux fan... not gunna touch fedora lol

but on to the point... how is the software for indivuduality when its mass produced... food for the brainwashed mind....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry to say in the first place&#8230; big linux fan&#8230; not gunna touch fedora lol</p>
<p>but on to the point&#8230; how is the software for indivuduality when its mass produced&#8230; food for the brainwashed mind&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-42417</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-42417</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s awful :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s awful <img src='http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/biggrin.png' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: numerodix</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-42378</link>
		<dc:creator>numerodix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/21/apple-least-creative-company-name-ever/#comment-42378</guid>
		<description>&gt; That’s actually also why I don’t appreciate “Nero”, it doesn’t bear any relevance to the company/product.

Well Nero was the mad ceasar who burned down Rome. And &quot;Nero Burning ROM&quot;, okay it isn&#039;t brilliant, but it&#039;s close enough I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> That’s actually also why I don’t appreciate “Nero”, it doesn’t bear any relevance to the company/product.</p>
<p>Well Nero was the mad ceasar who burned down Rome. And &#8220;Nero Burning ROM&#8221;, okay it isn&#8217;t brilliant, but it&#8217;s close enough I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

